Joseph Lyle Pritchard

Joseph “Liar” Pritchard is an incel that submitted false incident reports to the university he was attending, as well as to the police, when a fellow student began dating the girl he had been stalking for over 2 years. He did so out of sprite to get back at the individual for "deflowering the girl of his dreams".

Vanessa Mae Lee Sy is the woman in question. She encouraged Joseph Pritchard to create the false police and university incident reports against her ex-boyfriend to consolidate her own false reports which you can read about at this website. Joseph Pritchard obeyed her commands without hesitation, nor consideration of any moral principles, in hopes he would be rewarded with sexual acts.

The pair met at the University of Adelaide when Vanessa Sy recounts that Joseph Pritchard would seek her out in mutual lectures and position himself in the seat directly behind her every time they shared a lecture, which was multiple times per week. Keep in mind that throughout this time they did not know eachother. After months of what can only be described as stalking, Joseph Pritchard finally mustered up the courage to speak to Vanessa Sy, and that was when their friendship began.

Joseph Pritchard could not find the courage within himself to ask Vanessa Sy out for over 2 years, in which time another individual began dating Vanessa Sy. The fact another man came in and swooped her off her feet after he had been plotting, waiting for the perfect moment to ask her out, made Joseph Pritchard furious. You can see his unbridled anger in this cringe comment he left on their Facebook relationship status.

Naturally, he was anything but happy. That is why when the pair eventually broke up, Joseph Pritchard saw it as his opportunity to enact revenge by thinking of himself as Vanessa Sy's knight in shining armour. Vanessa Sy manipulated a weak Joseph Pritchard to go to the university security office with the following complaint:

It must have been an embarrassing experience for Joseph Pritchard when the security officers saw right through his weak acting and asked him if he knew Vanessa Sy. The security officers even noted such in their write-up. Let’s see what the defendant said to the university in his defence:

Here’s the witness statement mentioned by the defendant:

It’s interesting that, according to Ton Neill, Joseph Pritchard was with a friend. Yet, Joseph Pritchard makes no reference to this friend in his report, nor did that friend provide testimony towards Joseph Prithard's case. It would seem as though he left his friend out of this on purpose since the friend would have undoubtedly been confused as to what assault Joseph Pritchard was talking about. The defendant included some further comments:

Here's the image the defendant references:

Joseph Pritchard likely thought he was being a cool, brooding mastermind by sitting next to the guy he’s just made false reports against. How can you not interpret this move by Joseph Pritchard as some form of idiotic threat? You’re telling us that Joseph Pritchard claims to be so mortified and scared of the defendant that he had to be “escorted to Counselling Support” by the security officers at the university, yet when he actually sees the defendant in person, he just sits right next to him without a second thought? You’d think if Joseph Pritchard’s claims were true, he’d have immediately bolted out of the train carriage upon spotting the defendant.

Let’s look at the closing statement from the defendant:

The existance of CCTV footage is proven by the referral letter sent by the university:

All the evidence points to the fact that Joseph Pritchard is a lair who committed a heinous crime to try and win favour with a girl he fancied. He knows he wasn't assaulted and this isn’t more apparent than when Joseph Pritchard claims that he, “Intends to report the matter to SAPOL.” The defendant never heard anything from the police regarding Joseph Pritchard. This means that 1 of 2 things had to have happened: either Joseph Pritchard lied to the university about going to the police in attempt to get them to take the claim more seriously, or Joseph Pritchard did go to the police and they saw right through his deception, laughed at his face, and immediately threw his claim in the bin. Whichever course is true, both reflect quite poorly on Joseph Pritchard.

Needless to say, the university sided with the defendant on this matter.

Inceldom is a serious condition that affects many young men. As we’ve seen in this case it can cause men to do ridiculous things for mediocre women that they, for various reasons of mental instability, decide to worship like a goddess (often referred to colloquially as simping). Joseph Pritchard has since shown no remorse, acknowledgment of his actions, or self-respect, and should be avoided at all costs for one's own safety. Joseph Pritchard has since fled to the UK.